Happ, Daniela & Marc-Oliver Vorköper. 2005. Einige Bemerkungen zur syntaktischen und morphologischen Repräsentation von Numerus in Deutscher Gebärdensprache. In Helen Leuninger & Daniela Happ (eds.), Gebärdensprachen: Struktur, Erwerb, Verwendung (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft13), 87-111. Hamburg: Buske. – [3.1.1.1], [3.1.1.3]
Happ, Daniela & Marc-Oliver Vorköper. 2006. Deutsche Gebärdensprache. Ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch. Frankfurt a. M.: Fachhochschulverlag. – [3.1], [3.1.1.1], [3.1.1.3], [3.1.2.1], [3.3.1], [3.3.2]
Hänel, Barbara. 2005a. Der Erwerb der Deutschen Gebärdensprache als Erstsprache: die frühkindliche Sprachentwicklung von Subjekt- und Objektverbkongruenz in DGS. Tübingen: Narr. – [3.1], [3.1.1.1], [3.1.1.2], [3.1.1.3]
Hänel, Barbara. 2005b. The Acquisition of Agreement in DGS: Early Steps into spatially expressed Syntax. In Helen Leuninger & Daniela Happ (eds.), Gebärdensprachen: Struktur, Erwerb, Verwendung (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft13), 201-233. Hamburg: Buske. – [3.1], [3.1.1.1]
Hosemann, Jana. 2011. Eye Gaze and Verb Agreement in German Sign Language: A First Glance. Sign Language & Linguistics 14 (1). 76-93. – [3.1.1.2]
Keller, Jörg & Helen Leuninger. 2004. Grammatische Strukturen- Kognitive Prozesse. Ein Arbeitsbuch (2. Auflage). Tübingen: Gunter Narr. – [3.1.1.3]
Metzger, Christiane. 2009. Zeitlinien und temporale Gebärden in der Deutschen Gebärdensprache. Eine empirische Untersuchung. Seedorf: Signum. – [3.2.1, [3.2.2], [3.3.2.3]
Papaspyrou, Chrissostomos, Alexander von Meyenn, Michaela Matthaei & Bettina Herrmann. 2008. Grammatik der Deutschen Gebärdensprache aus der Sicht gehörloser Fachleute. Seedorf: Signum. – [3.1], [3.1.1.1], [3.1.1.2], [3.1.2], [3.2.1], [3.2.2]
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2003a. A Constraint-Based Analysis of Reciprocals in German Sign Languages. Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL) 13. 313-326. – [3.1.3]
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2003b. Optimal Reciprocals in German Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics 6. 3-42. – [3.1.3]
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2004a. An Optimality-Theoretic Account of German Sign Language Pluralization. Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL) 15. 234-245. – [3.1.3]
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2004b. Wie du mir, so ich dir: Reziprokkonstruktionen in DGS. Das Zeichen 66. 74-84. – [3.1.3]
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2005a. Backward and Sideward Reduplication in German Sign Language. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on Reduplication, 569-594. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. – [3.1.3]
Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll. 2012. Tense, aspect, modality. In Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign Language. An international handbook. 112-136. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. – [3.2.1]
Rathmann, Christian. 2000. The Optionality of Agreement Phrases: Evidence from Signed Languages. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, MA Thesis. – [3.1.1.1]
Rathmann, Christian & Gaurav Mathur. 2002. Is Verb Agreement the Same Cross-modally? In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoke Languages, 370-404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. – [3.1.1.1]
Rathmann, Christian & Gaurav Mathur. 2005. Unexpressed Features of Verb Agreement in Signed Languages. In Geert Booij, Emiliano Guevara, Angelo Ralli, Salvatore Sgroi & Sergio Scalise (eds.), Morphology and Linguistic Typology. Online Proceedings of the 4th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4), 235-250. Bologna: Università degli Studi di Bologna. – [3.1.1.1], [3.1.2], [3.1.2.2], [3.1.2.3]
Rathmann Christian & Gaurav Mathur. 2008. Verb Agreement as a Linguistic Innovation in Signed Languages. In Josep Quer (ed.), Signs of the Time: Selected Papers from TISLR 8, 191-216. Seedorf: Signum. – [3.1.1.1], [3.1.2], [3.1.2.2], [3.1.2.3]
Steinbach, Markus. 2012. Plurality. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign Language. An international handbook, 112-136. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. – [3.1.2.4]