References
Erlenkamp, Sonja. 2012. Syntax: Aus Gebärden Sätze bilden. In Hanna Eichmann, Martje Hansen & Jens Heßmann (eds.), Handbuch Deutsche Gebärdensprache. Sprachwissenschaftliche und anwendungsbezogene Perspektiven, 165-198. Seedorf: Signum. – [2.1.4.1]
Glück, Susanne & Roland Pfau. 1998a. On Classifying Classification as a Class of Inflection in German Sign Language. In Tina Cambier-Langeveld, Aniká Lipták & Michael Redford (eds.), ConSole VI Proceedings. 59-74. Leiden: SOLE. – [2.4.1]
Hansen, Martje. 2007. Warum braucht die deutsche Gebärdensprache kein Passiv?: Verfahren der Markierung semantischer Rollen in der DGS. Frankfurt a. M.: Lang. – [2.1.3.2]
Happ, Daniela & Marc-Oliver Vorköper. 2006. Deutsche Gebärdensprache: Ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch. Frankfurt a. M.: Fachhochschulverlag. – [2.1],[2.2.1.3], [2.2.1.4], [2.2.3], [2.3.2.1]
Herrmann, Annika. 2013. Modal and Focus Particles in Sign Languages. A Cross-Linguistic Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter/Ishara Press. – [2.3.1.3]
Herrmann, Annika, Sina Proske & Elisabeth Volk. 2019. Question-Answer Pairs in Sign Languages. In Edgar Onea, Malte Zimmermann & Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), Questions in Discourse, 96-131. Leiden: Brill. – [2.3.3.4]
Herrmann, Annika & Markus Steinbach. 2012. Quotation in Sign Languages – A Visible Context Shift. In Ingrid van Alphen & Isabelle Buchstaller (eds.), Quotatives. Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives, 203-228. Amsterdam: Benjamins. – [2.3.2.2]
Hosemann, Jana. 2011. Eye gaze and verb agreement in German Sign Language: A first glance. Sign Language & Linguistics 14(1). 76-93. – [2.1.2.3.2]
Keller, Jörg. 1998a. Aspekte der Raumnutzung in der Deutschen Gebärdensprache. Hamburg: Signum-Verlag. – [2.1.3.3]
Loos, Cornelia. (2017). The syntax and semantics of resultative constructions in Deutsche Gebärdensprache (DGS) and American Sign Language (ASL). Texas: University of Texas at Austin dissertation. – [2.1.4.2], [2.1.2.5]
Macht, Claudia & Markus Steinbach. 2019. Regionalsprachliche Merkmale in der Deutschen Gebärdensprache. In Joachim Herrgen & Jürgen E. Schmidt (eds.), Sprache und Raum. Ein internationales Handbuch der Sprachvariation. 916-937. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. – [2.3.1.2]
Mehling, Karin. 2010. Heute hier, morgen dort - Deixis und Anaphorik in der Deutschen Gebärdensprache. München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität dissertation. – [2.1.3.3]
Murmann, Christina. 2012. The agreement auxiliary PAM in German Sign Language – an empirical investigation. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine Universität MA thesis. [2.3.1.2]
Oomen, Marloes. 2020. Iconicity as a mediator between verb semantics and morphosyntactic structure. A corpus-based study on verbs in German Sign Language. Amsterdam: LOT. – [2.4.1.1], [2.4.1.2]
Oomen, Marloes & Vadim Kimmelmann. 2019. Body-anchored verbs and argument omission in two sign languages. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1) 42. 1-36. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.741. – [2.4.1.1], [2.4.1.2]
Papaspyrou, Chrissostomos, Alexander von Meyenn, Michaela Matthaei & Bettina Herrmann. 2008. Grammatik der Deutschen Gebärdensprache aus der Sicht gehörloser Fachleute. Seedorf: Signum – [2.3.1.3], [2.3.1.6], [2.3.2.1]
Pfau, Roland. 2002. Applying morphosyntactic and phonological readjustment rules in natural language negation. In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 263–295. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. – [2.2.1.1]
Pfau, Roland. 2008. The Grammar of Headshake: A Typological Perspective on German Sign Language Negation. Linguistics in Amsterdam 1. 37-74. – [2.3.1.4]
Pfau, Roland, Martin Salzmann & Markus Steinbach. 2018. The Syntax of Sign Language Agreement. Common Ingredients but Unusual Recipe. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 3(1), 107. 1-46. http://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.511– [2.3.1.2]
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2005c. Relative clauses in German Sign Language: Extraposition and reconstruction. Paper presented to the Proceedings of NELS, 2005. – [2.1.2.5]
Proske, Sina. in prep. Word order in German Sign Language. Göttingen: Georg-August-Universität dissertation. – [2.3.1], [2.3.1.1], [2.3.1.2], [2.3.1.6], [2.3.2.1], [2.3.3.5] [2.4.1], [2.4.1.1], [2.4.1.2]
Steinbach, Markus & Roland Pfau. 2007. Grammaticalization of auxiliaries in sign languages. In Pamela Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible Variation: Comparative Studies on Sign Language Structure, 303-340. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. – [2.1.2.3.1]