3.4.3. Position of the noun phrase with the relative clause within the matrix clause
In LIS full relative clauses, the relative clause (including the head noun) precedes the main clause regardless of the syntactic role of the head noun in the main clause. In the examples below, the head noun child is the subject of the main clause predicate fall_down in (a); and the indirect object of the main clause predicate give in (b). In both sentences, the relative clause precedes the main clause.
rel
a. [childa fotball play pea] yesterday tree CL(V): โfall_downโ
โThe child who plays football yesterday fell off a tree.โ
rel
b. [childa football play pea] yesterday a-n-n-ab ball new bCL(unspread curved open 5): โgive_ballโa done
โYesterday Anna gave a new ball to the child who plays football.โ
In LIS free relatives, the relative clause always precedes the main clause, regardless of the syntactic role of the wh-sign in the main clause. In the example (a) below, the wh-sign who is the subject of the main clause predicate exit, while in (b) the wh-sign which is the object of the main clause predicate see. In both sentences, the relative clause precedes the main clause.
rel
a. [exam done who] go_away be_able
โWho has taken the exam can go out.โ (Branchini, 2009: 104)
rel
b. [p-a-o-l-o like which] ix1 see done
โI saw which Paolo likes.โ (Branchini, 2009: 105)