10.2.1.3. Overlapping turns
ix1 vote ix3pl no_more yes know++The third type of turn taking concerns those situations in which two or more signers communicate simultaneously and overlap each other. There are various possible reasons for such overlapping behaviour. It can happen, for example, when two signers both contribute to a dialogue resulting in a joined turn construction, as in the example below.
A: finally work finish ix2 relax ix2 relax ix2 year^five document how yes know++
B: ix1 retirement ix1 know ix1 slide five ix1 finally ix1 go_out young before ix1 1explain2 ix1 2come1 house poss1
‘Finally you stopped working, now you can relax!’ ‘I am retired, I know, thanks to the policy of the “5-year slide”. Finally! I retired earlier and I’m still young.’ ‘How did you sort out the papers for the 5 years?’ ‘I will explain it to you at my place’. ‘Yes, that’s fine.’
A different situation arises when the two signers compete for taking the turn. An example of such competitive dialogical construction is presented below.
A: qartichoke politics^area ix1 trust zero ix1 be_fed_up ix1 vote ix3pl no_more
B: ix1 be_fed_up suck ix1 true better vote need exist.not but ix1 need law hundred^four qartichoke
A: qartichoke c’mon exist exist.not ix1 impossible_no_way
B: qartichoke never approve pe
‘I’ve no trust in politicians!’ ‘I’m fed up! It sucks!’ ‘I’m fed up!’ ‘Well, it’s better not to vote.’ ‘I don’t vote for them anymore!’ ‘But I need the law 104, so when?’ ‘When?!’ ‘When? It will never be approved!’ ‘C’mon, no way!’
Regardless of the reason for the overlapping turn taking, the general model for this type of dialogue is reported below.
A: sign sign sign
B: sign sign sign