References
Açan, Zeynep. 2007. A linguistic analysis on basic sentence types in Turkish Sign Language (TİD) with reference to non-manual activity. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University PhD dissertation.
Dikyuva, Hasan, Bahtiyar Makaroğlu & Engin Arık. 2015. Türk İşaret Dili dilbilgisi kitabı [Turkish Sign Language grammar book]. Ankara: TC Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı.
Dikyuva, Hasan, Bahtiyar Makaroğlu & Engin Arık. 2017. Turkish Sign Language grammar. Ankara: The Republic of Turkey Ministry of Family and Social Policies.
Gökgöz, Kadir. 2009. Topics in Turkish Sign Language (Türk İşaret Dili – TID) Syntax: Verb movement, negation, and clausal structure. Istanbul, Turkey: Boğaziçi University MA thesis.
Gökgöz, Kadir. 2011. Negation in Turkish Sign Language: The syntax of nonmanual markers. Sign Language & Linguistics 14(1). 49-75.
Göksel, Aslı & Meltem Kelepir. 2011a. Issues in complexity: Sentential complementation in Turkish Sign Language. (Paper presented at the Complex sentences and beyond in sign and spoken languages, University of Göttingen, 13-14 October 2011.)
Göksel, Aslı & Meltem Kelepir. 2016. Observations on clausal complementation in Turkish Sign Language. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & A. Hermann (eds), A matter of complexity: Subordination in sign languages, 65–94. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503238-005
Hakgüder, Emre. 2015a. Complex clauses with embedded constituent interrogatives in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). Istanbul, Turkey: Boğaziçi University MA thesis.
İşsever, Selçuk & Bahtiyar Makaroğlu. 2015. WH-Movement in Turkish Sign Language. In E. Arık (ed.), Current directions in Turkish Sign Language research, 167-189. New Castle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kayabaşı, Demet. In progress. The causative-inchoative alternation in Turkish Sign Language and the age of acquisition effects on complex clauses. İstanbul, Turkey: Boğaziçi University MA Thesis.
Kayabaşı, Demet, Hande Sevgi & A. Sumru Özsoy. in press. Null arguments in Turkish Sign Language. Morphological complexity within and across oundaries. In A. Gürer, D. Uygun-Gökmen & B. Öztürk (eds.), In honor of Aslı Göksel. John Benjamins
Kelepir, Meltem, Aslı Özkul, & Elvan T. Özparlak. 2018. Agent-backgrounding in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). Sign Language & Linguistics 21(2), 257-283.
Kubus, Okan & Annette Hohenberger. 2013. Phonology and phonetics of reciprocals in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). In E. Arık (ed.), Current directions in Turkish Sign Language research, 101-142. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kubus, Okan & Annette Hohenberger. 2015. The phonology and phonetics of reciprocals in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). In E. Arık (ed.), Current directions in Turkish Sign Language research, 101- 142. New Castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kubus, Okan. 2016. Relative Clause Constructions in Turkish Sign Language. Hamburg, Germany: University of Hamburg PhD Dissertation.
Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar, & Hasan Dikyuva (eds.). 2017. Güncel Türk İşaret Dili sözlüğü [The contemporary Turkish Sign Language dictionary]. Ankara: Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı. URL: http://tidsozluk.net.
Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar, & Selçuk İşsever. 2018. Agreement verbs in Turkish Sign Language (TİD) from the perspective of templatic morphology. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 29(1), 51-86.
Sevgi, Hande. 2019. Effects of age of acquisition on morphosyntactic structures in Turkish Sign Language: Evidence from classifiers. İstanbul, Turkey: Boğaziçi University MA thesis.
Sevinç, A. Müge. 2006. Grammatical relations and word order in Turkish Sign Language TİD. Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University MA thesis.